Approaching from behind I thought, “Oh hey, here’s one of those Chryslers that’s supposed to look like a Bentley. How quaint.” Then I got closer and realized it was a Bentley. On 24th.
They must have been getting tacos.
UPDATE: Apparently it is in fact an undercover Chrysler (still quaint) and I should probably take my employer up on their free vision plan. I still hope they got tacos though.
 and I should probably take […]</p>
%5Bvia+%3Ca+href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.missionmission.org%2F2010%2F10%2F20%2Fballin-down-24th%2F%22%3EMission+Mission%3C%2Fa%3E%5D&clickthru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.missionmission.org%2F2010%2F10%2F20%2Fballin-down-24th%2F){kind=link}
A hooker cut to look like Lana Turner is still a hooker.
She *is* Lana Turner.
That is to say, it *is* a Chrysler, not a Bentley that looks like a Chrysler which was made to look like a Bentley.
Yep, that’s definitely still a Chrysler.
Let’s say it was a Bentley.. or let’s say it was a Maybach.
Who cares?
the answer i guess, is that if indeed it was a bentley then there is a piercing social critique on class, status, and gentrification. Nice cars in the mission, Get the fuck out of here!?111?1!!!
(maybe that the author confused a 30K car for a 300K car means that such a critique is still in play?)
I have the 1970 version of this car ( the 300 ) in a convertible. Never felt the need to disguise it as a Bentley.
Bob Guccione is dead people. That car is just his avatar.
Lol, you thought that car was a Bentley??